Home
Corporate Overview
Corporate Profile
Officers & Directors
Governance Documents
Committee Charting
Stock Information
Stock Quote
Historic Prices
Stock Splits & Dividends
Financial Calculators
SEC Filings
Documents
Annual Report
Insider Filings
Insider Ownership
Institutional Ownership
Fact Sheet
Financial Information
Financial Highlights
Peer Analysis
As-Reported Financials
Balance Sheet
Income Statement
Cash Flow Statement
Financial Charting
News & Market Data
Press Releases
Event Calendar
Market Makers
Mergers & Acquisitions
Presentations
Other Information
Information Request
Email Notifications
FAQ
IR Site Map
Locations
Contact Us
Help
Search
Menu
Personal
Accounts
Checking
Savings
Money Market
CDs
IRAs
CDARS
Loans
Mortgage
Home Equity
Consumer
Credit Card
Financial Calculators
Services
ID TheftSmart
ID TheftSmart Authentication
Online Banking
Bill Pay
Mobile Banking
Mobile Deposit
Digital Payments
Debit MasterCard®
e-Statements
Overdraft Protection
Safe Deposit
Business
Accounts
Checking
Savings, Money Market & CD's
Loans
Commercial Banking
Operating Lines of Credit
Builder and Development Banking
Tenant Improvement Financing
Small Business Loans
Business Visa
Equipment
Financial Calculators
Services
Business Debit MasterCard®
Online Banking
Cash Management
Merchant Bankcard
Medical Banking
Community
What's Happening
Fill-A-Bag
Properties
Financial Wellness
About
Hours & Locations
Branch & ATM Locator
Corporate Profile
Investor Relations
Press Releases
Careers
Code of Conduct
IR Menu
Investor Search
Search
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
Institutional Ownership
Ownership > 100%
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.